The Jeffrey MacDonald Case

Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints

 

What happens when we zoom in on these two images?
 

The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: Cropped from original, with the correct aspect ratio maintained

Cropped from original JPEG crime photo, with the correct aspect ratio maintained

The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: FrmrCSI’s image, which has an incorrect aspect ratio, making the foot longer than it actually is

FrmrCSI’s image, which has an incorrect aspect ratio, making the foot longer than it should be


One look at the images below and the answer is obvious.  No ridge detail or other data which would be needed for a valid analysis exists in any image below.  Because of the loss of scanner information in the original JPEG images, the loss of the correct aspect ratio in FrmrCSI’s image, the degradation and interpolation and anti-aliasing that occurred during his efforts at image processing (creating pixel information which would not be found in the original BMP, TGA or TIF scan and resulting in the “smoothing” in the magnified versions of FrmrCSI’s images below) and other factors, his poorly processed image is in no way valid for “analysis” of the type he claims to have done.
 

The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: Cropped from original and magnified, with the correct aspect ratio maintained The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: FrmrCSI’s image (exhibiting incorrect aspect ratio), magnified
The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: Cropped from original and magnified, with the correct aspect ratio maintained The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: FrmrCSI’s image (exhibiting incorrect aspect ratio), magnified and showing the "smoothing" resulting from computer interpolation / anti-aliasing (adding information not in the original scan)
The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: Cropped from original and magnified, with the correct aspect ratio maintained The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints: FrmrCSI’s image (exhibiting incorrect aspect ratio), magnified and showing the "smoothing" resulting from computer interpolation / anti-aliasing (adding information not in the original scan)

 

The Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Debunking FrmrCSI’s alleged “analysis” of the bloody footprints

BACK TO TOP