November 18, 1971: USACIL Report P-D-FA-C-FP-82-70-R33
 Page 1
Examination and comparison of the questioned handwriting and handprinting appearing on Exhibit W6 in conjunction with Exhibit W3 resulted in the following conclusions: a. The questioned handwritten entries appearing on Exhibit W6 could have been executed by the writer of Exhibit W3.  Page 2
b. The questioned handprinted entry "number one" appearing on Exhibit W6 was slowly executed/retraced and is therefore not a normal product of the writer, however, it could have been executed by the writer of Exhibit W3. |
March 29, 1972: USACIL Consolidated Report
 Page 29
Examination and comparison of the questioned handprinting appearing on Exhibit W-5 with the exemplars, Exhibits W-2 thru W-4 resulted in the following conclusions: a. The questioned handprinting appearing on Exhibit W-5 was very probably executed by a right handed persion utilizing the index and middle fingers of the right hand. b. The writers of the exemplars, Exhibits W-2 thru W-4 could neither be eliminated nor identified as having executed the questioned handprinting appearing on Exhibit W-5. |
